understand the crux...do not laugh it away by saying related / unrelated...I also know Tamil Nadu & GT are partial ac and non ac...I want to say that such arbitrariness (or this may be railway policy) is there in the priority list of providing LHB that a rajdhani is not provided LHB while other trains are being given LHB...southern aur northern to argument ke liye hain...there should be a policy na...you provide lhb first to all shatabdis/rajdhanis/durontos...then shift your focus to other trains...

---

Firstly When did I laugh ..
Secondly You have to see train priority also. TN and GT are well known legendary trains so well deserved. I don't say BSP rajdhani don't deserve but we can't question TN and GT also. Hence no point comparing as I said earlier... LHB process is dependent on so many factors it's impossible to predict why this train got LHB before this train.

---

I believe on account of GT's "priority" status or maybe even to increase its stature, it is being shifted from New Delhi to Sarai Rohilla station...sir there are many other extraneous considerations involved...if you want to convey that railway board does not like to play politics and works according to the rule book...then you are mistaken...as far as legendary is concerned GT is certainly legendary...laugh it away was used in the colloquial sense...

---

yes, railway board certainly play politics.. no doubt..
regarding BSP Rajdani I heard that board has already given orders to Kapurthala so as soon as they complete order bsp rajdhani can go LHB ... may be about 3-4 months..

---

many many thanks for the good news...dil khush kar diya...

---